
International People’s Forum convenes first day
in the wake of mounting obstacles
By Debayani Kar
I am writing this blog from Batam, an Indonesian island an hour’s ferry ride from Singapore, and the site of the International People’s Forum (IPF). I am participating in the Forum, a meeting of international NGOs and activists from across the globe and includes seminars, panel discussions, and analysis. We are meeting here as the IMF and World Bank prepare to hold their Annual Meetings across the water in Singapore. Those meetings begin on Sunday in earnest.
The past 10 days leading up to the IPF, which officially opened this morning in Batam, Indonesia, have been tumultuous on many different levels for both forum organizers and participants.
The forum was conceived as an international forum to “articulate critiques, express protest and assert alternatives to the role, policies and operations of these institutions.”
We knew the stipulations placed by Singapore’s government on civil society activities would be a difficult pill to swallow, but none of us could have predicted the challenges many of us would face getting to Batam and even being able to convene this conference.
In recent days, pressure from the Singapore government almost led to the cancellation of the Batam events, but fortunately an international public outcry helped to overturn the Indonesian government’s position.
Meanwhile, in Singapore the government announced a blacklist of individuals who would be denied entry to the country, despite the fact that many had already obtained accreditation from the IMF and World Bank to attend the annual meetings there. That list has since been updated as protests continue inside the Annual Meetings.
This week, we have come to recognize that this so-called blacklist is much larger than the 28 individuals the Singapore government has referred to, but encompasses many activists from around the globe – both those who had obtained IMF/World Bank accreditation, and those who chose not to.
Upward of two dozen individuals this week have faced detention or deportation at the hands of the Singapore immigration authorities at the airport. Many of them were only intending to come to Batam via Singapore.
Because of all this, civil society organizations including Jubilee USA signed on to a boycott of the official meetings of the IMF and World Bank. The boycott statement garnered 163 signatories from all over the world. We launched the boycott this morning to a roomful of press here in Batam.
Despite all the challenges, more than 500 individuals have come to Batam for the IPF. I was honored this morning to address the IPF opening plenary session to share a few words about the role of Western, or Northern, groups, such as the U.S. and the U.K., in the Global South’s struggle against the policies of the international financial institutions.

I detailed some of the ways in which Northern groups have provided effective solidarity to Southern campaigns, highlighting:
- Jubilee USA ’s current work to urge the U.S. Congress to help undertake debt audits
- Norwegian debt groups’ successful campaign to have their government heed their call to begin to address illegitimate debt
- and the campaign by groups in the U.K. to call on their government to disengage from the IMF and World Bank based on their harmful economic policy conditionalities, which run contrary to the U.K. government’s position.
One of the comments that stood out to me as I sat in this morning’s sessions was from Walden Bello, director of Focus on the Global South in Bangkok.
Walden recounted a recent interview with a journalist who asked why he had been placed on the blacklist. Walden replied that he did not know since he is but a 60-year-old man with arthritis and other ailments…
More seriously, Walden surmised that the IMF and World Bank had done more damage to their credibility as institutions working against global poverty in this last week of events, than we ourselves as civil society might have been able to do, had we been given more space to critique the institutions directly in Singapore.
Turning to a more personal observation, it has been interesting that in my limited travel around Batam I have seen that everyone here knows about this conference.
We asked our taxi driver at the ferry terminal to take us to the conference center and he replied, “Oh, yes, you will go there to talk about the World Bank being a problem.”
For me, this reception—which has been both good and bad of course—is quite different from some of our conferences in Washington, D.C., where some press I have spoken to categorically state they will never attend because they are mundane every day events.
For more information on the IMF/World Bank meetings in Singapore and the civil society response, see: www.ifiwatchnet.org and www.bicusa.org.
And of course stay tuned for more from me!
Debayani Kar is the communications and advocacy coordinator at Jubilee USA Network, which is based in Washington, D.C.
Before I sign out for today, below is a copy of the press release we sent to the media this morning about our support for the boycott.
PRESS RELEASE
Jubilee USA Network
www.jubileeusa.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Debi Kar, in Singapore/Indonesia, +62 81 372 877199 Neil Watkins, in Washington, D.C., 202 783-0129
Jubilee USA Network Joins 160+ Organizations in Civil Society Boycott of IMF/World Bank Meetings
Organizations Will Not Participate in Official Events in Solidarity with Dozens of NGOs Banned or Deported by Singapore Government
WASHINGTON – Jubilee USA Network today joined more than 160 organizations from across the globe in a boycott of official events at the IMF and World Bank meetings set to begin early next week in Singapore. While the Network had received accreditation to participate in the meetings, events of the past week in which the Singaporean government barred entry, detained or deported dozens of civil society colleagues from across the globe led to the decision not to participate.
“The treatment of our colleagues and partners from across the globe in the past week at the hands of Singapore authorities has been appalling, and we cannot in good conscience participate in the IMF meetings next week while our close colleagues are banned and mistreated” said Neil Watkins, National Coordinator of Jubilee USA Network. “Though the World Bank and IMF have attempted to reverse the situation, we must wonder why the institutions sought to hold their Annual Meetings in a repressive state such as Singapore in the first place.”
Jubilee USA Network joined with other civil society organizations at the site of the International Peoples’ Forum (IPF) on the IMF and World Bank in Batam, Indonesia, a short ferry ride from Singapore. Several days of meetings, plenary session, workshops, and strategy sessions will be held in Batam at the Asrama Haji Center in Batam, Indonesia through the 17th. Civil society organizations today formally announced the boycott in Batam.
The boycott has been endorsed by 163 organizations from all parts of the world, and includes many organizations that have long assumed prominent roles in civil society interactions with the international financial institutions. Participants at the IPF will discuss current issues on the agenda of the IMF/World Bank meetings including the need for expanded debt cancellation for impoverished nations, changes in the governance structure of the institutions, and the anti-corruption agenda of the World Bank.
About 20 people have been deported or “refused entry” to Singapore. Organizers also point out that the Singapore government pressured the Riau Province (Indonesia) government to cancel alternative events on the neighboring island of Batam, but the Indonesian government has allowed them to proceed.
“Our boycott is a response to egregious hypocrisy,” said Ana Maria Nemenzo, President of the Freedom from Debt Coalition, Philippines, and one of those informed in advance that she would not be allowed into Singapore despite receiving accreditation to the meetings from the IMF and World Bank. “While World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz prepares to launch his new good governance and anti-corruption initiative, he fails to promote those very principles for his own institution as it meets in Singapore. Civil society has long been unsatisfied with their marginalization by these institutions, but this takes that problem to a new low.”